<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon PowerShot SX1IS 10 MP CMOS Digital Camera with 20x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.8-inch LCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd</link>
	<description>All About Canon&#039;s Best Digital Cameras</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. cohen</title>
		<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/comment-page-1#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>J. cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Make no mistake, this is not a point and shoot camera.  While it comes with great specs, it is a bit harder to use if you&#039;re not used to that level of camera.  I had numerous pictures come out blurry.  The ISO almost has to be redone for each picture (frustrating!).  The instruction book must be read, and even then it is difficult to remember what all the symbols mean.  Some of the pictures appear grainy.  The high def video takes up enormous memory.  Maybe someone with experience with better cameras would love this and make good pictures with it.  For me, there was too much dissapointment with it.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make no mistake, this is not a point and shoot camera.  While it comes with great specs, it is a bit harder to use if you&#8217;re not used to that level of camera.  I had numerous pictures come out blurry.  The ISO almost has to be redone for each picture (frustrating!).  The instruction book must be read, and even then it is difficult to remember what all the symbols mean.  Some of the pictures appear grainy.  The high def video takes up enormous memory.  Maybe someone with experience with better cameras would love this and make good pictures with it.  For me, there was too much dissapointment with it.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hike</title>
		<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/comment-page-1#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Upgraded from S3-IS and guess what, the S3-IS provides more pleasing results. The photographic quality of the SX1 is not even close to the Canon dSLRs using CMOS. The CMOS sensor in SX1 is a very big disappointment. Color and dynamic range are no better than the SX10 and the noise from the SX1 sensor is what I would expect from cheap camera. Amazon service is great -- so if you are looking for a good prosumer camera, go get a Canon SX10 IS, or Nikon, or Sony. Don&#039;t even bother wtih this overpriced inferior SX1 deployment of CMOS technology. 
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upgraded from S3-IS and guess what, the S3-IS provides more pleasing results. The photographic quality of the SX1 is not even close to the Canon dSLRs using CMOS. The CMOS sensor in SX1 is a very big disappointment. Color and dynamic range are no better than the SX10 and the noise from the SX1 sensor is what I would expect from cheap camera. Amazon service is great &#8212; so if you are looking for a good prosumer camera, go get a Canon SX10 IS, or Nikon, or Sony. Don&#8217;t even bother wtih this overpriced inferior SX1 deployment of CMOS technology.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pvc Distributors</title>
		<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/comment-page-1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Pvc Distributors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd#comment-351</guid>
		<description>We use our cameras in our business every day. We have had 3 Nikons in the past. All had outstanding PQ, but all died about every 2-3 years. So we decided this time to look for another camera. We decided on the Canon SX1 IS due to the reviews here. Let me tell you how bad this camera is;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;1. The PQ is horrid. One of our CAMERA PHONES produces nearly identical PQ. Only slightly worse. I called Canon and after talking to the nice person on the phone, they had no explanation. They suggested I email images to one of their higher up techs. Two days later, no response. Update: A week later I called and asked about the pictures, what they thought of them. They said they did not get them. I emailed again to the person on the phone and she did get them while I was on the phone and said they were typical photos for the camera. If that&#039;s typical, I have to say Canon has very low standards for this camera.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;2. The buttons are in all the wrong places. You cannot carry or handle this camera w/o hitting buttons unintentionally. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;3. This camera weights 1.5 pounds. That&#039;s about equal to 2 12oz cans of soda. Go pick up two cans of soda and try to carry that around like you would a camera. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;4. There is only one way to grip this camera and it requires 2 hands. There is no other way to use it successfully.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;5. It only comes with standard rca cables to view the HD video. Which, is just horrible. Who in their right mind would put a standard cable with a HD camera?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;6. The SD card is very, very hard to get out. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;7. The HD movies will not play on my computer. [UPDATE: We had to update to QT 7 to get them to play. Which does work. However, the video is jerky and jumpy. About every 1 second it seems to skip several frames. The PQ just just good, on the very low level of HD expected quality.]
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I know I&#039;m being overally dramatic, but it&#039;s hard to keep it cool considering this is a $500+ &quot;HD&quot; camera. I do LOVE the wide field of view, it&#039;s awesome. The 20x zoom is outstanding... in theory. the problem is, both are worthless if the PQ is not any better than a camera phone. I&#039;ve uploaded my own photos here taken with this camera so you can see for yourself. One shows the dark dot, and the other is the kitchen sink area. You be the judge if I&#039;m being overly critical of this $500 camera.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Bottom line: if you care about the picture quality, ease of use, or ergonomics, skip this one.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;My experience level: well seasoned amateur.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I question some of the reviews on this site. They sound like they were written by professional copywriters for a PR campaign. Trust this one and the other review &quot;Noise and grain.&quot; That is the truth for this camera. This camera is a dog.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use our cameras in our business every day. We have had 3 Nikons in the past. All had outstanding PQ, but all died about every 2-3 years. So we decided this time to look for another camera. We decided on the Canon SX1 IS due to the reviews here. Let me tell you how bad this camera is;</p>
<p>1. The PQ is horrid. One of our CAMERA PHONES produces nearly identical PQ. Only slightly worse. I called Canon and after talking to the nice person on the phone, they had no explanation. They suggested I email images to one of their higher up techs. Two days later, no response. Update: A week later I called and asked about the pictures, what they thought of them. They said they did not get them. I emailed again to the person on the phone and she did get them while I was on the phone and said they were typical photos for the camera. If that&#8217;s typical, I have to say Canon has very low standards for this camera.</p>
<p>2. The buttons are in all the wrong places. You cannot carry or handle this camera w/o hitting buttons unintentionally. </p>
<p>3. This camera weights 1.5 pounds. That&#8217;s about equal to 2 12oz cans of soda. Go pick up two cans of soda and try to carry that around like you would a camera. </p>
<p>4. There is only one way to grip this camera and it requires 2 hands. There is no other way to use it successfully.</p>
<p>5. It only comes with standard rca cables to view the HD video. Which, is just horrible. Who in their right mind would put a standard cable with a HD camera?</p>
<p>6. The SD card is very, very hard to get out. </p>
<p>7. The HD movies will not play on my computer. [UPDATE: We had to update to QT 7 to get them to play. Which does work. However, the video is jerky and jumpy. About every 1 second it seems to skip several frames. The PQ just just good, on the very low level of HD expected quality.]</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m being overally dramatic, but it&#8217;s hard to keep it cool considering this is a $500+ &#8220;HD&#8221; camera. I do LOVE the wide field of view, it&#8217;s awesome. The 20x zoom is outstanding&#8230; in theory. the problem is, both are worthless if the PQ is not any better than a camera phone. I&#8217;ve uploaded my own photos here taken with this camera so you can see for yourself. One shows the dark dot, and the other is the kitchen sink area. You be the judge if I&#8217;m being overly critical of this $500 camera.</p>
<p>Bottom line: if you care about the picture quality, ease of use, or ergonomics, skip this one.</p>
<p>My experience level: well seasoned amateur.</p>
<p>I question some of the reviews on this site. They sound like they were written by professional copywriters for a PR campaign. Trust this one and the other review &#8220;Noise and grain.&#8221; That is the truth for this camera. This camera is a dog.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armand Waddington</title>
		<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/comment-page-1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Armand Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had several Canon cameras over the years. I decided to buy this one as a replacement for my lost A650. In general, Canons are very good cameras, with well thought-out menus and controls. Not this model. For some reason Canon decided to scrap all that was good about their cameras and make it much, MUCH worse:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt; - using menus and changing shooting settings is like navigating a maze. Even if you&#039;re used to other Canon models this one is unlike the others.. very unintuitive.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt; - it has a dial for selecting settings and options. The dial quality feels cheap, is quite unresponsive and inconvenient to use.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt; - it&#039;s a battery hog. It takes four AA batteries and even with fully-charged 2600 mA NiMH batteries it&#039;s out of juice in couple of days.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt; - the lens doesn&#039;t retract but has a lens cap instead. You have to put it on/off every time you want to take a shot.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt; - it&#039;s fairly bulky and quite heavy, a big drawback if you&#039;re travelling or have to carry it around all day.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;To sum up, this camera is overpriced for what it is. You can get similar models for much less. Alternatively, for just a little more you can get yourself an SLR.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had several Canon cameras over the years. I decided to buy this one as a replacement for my lost A650. In general, Canons are very good cameras, with well thought-out menus and controls. Not this model. For some reason Canon decided to scrap all that was good about their cameras and make it much, MUCH worse:</p>
<p> &#8211; using menus and changing shooting settings is like navigating a maze. Even if you&#8217;re used to other Canon models this one is unlike the others.. very unintuitive.</p>
<p> &#8211; it has a dial for selecting settings and options. The dial quality feels cheap, is quite unresponsive and inconvenient to use.</p>
<p> &#8211; it&#8217;s a battery hog. It takes four AA batteries and even with fully-charged 2600 mA NiMH batteries it&#8217;s out of juice in couple of days.</p>
<p> &#8211; the lens doesn&#8217;t retract but has a lens cap instead. You have to put it on/off every time you want to take a shot.</p>
<p> &#8211; it&#8217;s fairly bulky and quite heavy, a big drawback if you&#8217;re travelling or have to carry it around all day.</p>
<p>To sum up, this camera is overpriced for what it is. You can get similar models for much less. Alternatively, for just a little more you can get yourself an SLR.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wen</title>
		<link>http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd/comment-page-1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Wen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canonpowershotsdonline.com/canon-powershot-sx1is-10-mp-cmos-digital-camera-with-20x-wide-angle-optical-image-stabilized-zoom-and-2-8-inch-lcd#comment-349</guid>
		<description>I was so disappointed with this camera, I don&#039;t know how Canon could release it with such flaws.  I am a Canon user since 1975 and currently use a DSLR of theirs.  I wanted good quality HD movies mainly in this camera, but I also wanted something that I could use if I wanted to travel lightly.  Unless you have blazing daylight, the noise in this camera is worse than any I have seen in a camera in this category.  My Powershot A720 IS which I got last year is way better.  shame on Canon for not doing a better job - they can!  Sent it back.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so disappointed with this camera, I don&#8217;t know how Canon could release it with such flaws.  I am a Canon user since 1975 and currently use a DSLR of theirs.  I wanted good quality HD movies mainly in this camera, but I also wanted something that I could use if I wanted to travel lightly.  Unless you have blazing daylight, the noise in this camera is worse than any I have seen in a camera in this category.  My Powershot A720 IS which I got last year is way better.  shame on Canon for not doing a better job &#8211; they can!  Sent it back.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
